The article discusses the challenging position of Jennifer Crumbley as a Michigan jury considers her accountability for her son’s deadly actions at Oxford High School. The author examines the evidence presented by prosecutors to demonstrate Crumbley’s alleged negligence in providing her son with unsupervised access to the firearm used in the killing spree. However, the evidence seems ambiguous, and there are conflicting perceptions of Ethan’s true nature and intentions. The article also highlights Ethan’s interactions with school counselors, his parents’ response to warning signs, and their decision to leave him at school despite concerns. Ultimately, the author notes the absence of Michigan law requiring safe firearm storage, which adds complexity to the case. The article critically reflects on the charges against Crumbley and the impact of the case on parenting decisions with unforeseen and disastrous outcomes.